In a groundbreaking study published in ‘Anthropogenic Pollution,’ Mohammad Mahdi Safaee, a Ph.D. student in Architecture at the Islamic Azad University Campus, Kish International Branch, Iran, has shed light on the environmental risks associated with urban underground public space development in Tehran. This research not only highlights the potential hazards but also underscores the commercial implications for the construction sector in a rapidly urbanizing metropolis.
The study employs a dual-phase approach, utilizing Environmental Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (EFMEA) and the Delphi Technique to assess various environmental risks. Safaee’s research identified 12 distinct risks tied to the development of underground public spaces, with three risks standing out as particularly alarming: sewage discharge, inappropriate ventilation, and seismic hazards. The Risk Priority Numbers (RPN) for these risks were notably high, with seismic hazards leading the pack at an RPN of 640.
“The development of urban underground public spaces can significantly enhance service levels and urban per capita,” Safaee noted, emphasizing the importance of integrating safety and environmental considerations into urban planning. This sentiment resonates with urban planners and construction professionals, as the push for more underground developments could lead to increased efficiency in land use and improved urban infrastructure.
The implications of this research extend far beyond environmental safety. With Tehran grappling with urban sprawl and pollution, the construction sector stands at a crossroads. As Safaee pointed out, “It is crucial to pay attention to the environmental, health, and safety policies,” suggesting that adherence to these guidelines could not only mitigate risks but also enhance the public perception of construction projects. This could lead to greater investment and support for underground developments, ultimately fostering a more sustainable urban environment.
Moreover, the study indicates that medium-level risks such as construction waste accumulation and thermal pollution also warrant attention. Addressing these risks could offer construction companies a competitive edge by positioning them as responsible developers committed to sustainable practices.
As urban areas continue to expand and evolve, the findings from this research could serve as a blueprint for future developments. The construction industry may need to adopt more rigorous risk assessment methodologies like EFMEA to ensure that new projects are not only profitable but also environmentally sound.
For those interested in exploring the detailed findings of this study, the full article is available in ‘Anthropogenic Pollution’ (translated as “Pollution Caused by Human Activities”). To learn more about Safaee’s academic work, visit his profile at Islamic Azad University Campus, Kish International Branch.
This research marks a significant step toward balancing urban development with environmental stewardship, a challenge that the construction sector must embrace as cities like Tehran look to the future.
