In a groundbreaking study conducted in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, researchers have unveiled critical insights into the factors influencing the acceleration of construction work, focusing on the trifecta of schedule, cost, and CO2 emissions. Led by Wattana Surapha from the Department of Civil Engineering, this research published in the Journal of Engineering highlights the urgent need for the construction sector to adapt its methodologies in light of increasing environmental concerns and economic pressures.
The study employs a comprehensive life cycle assessment, critical path methods (CPM), and the analytical hierarchy process to evaluate construction practices. Surapha emphasizes the significance of these methodologies, stating, “The integration of life cycle assessment with critical path methods provides a robust framework for making informed decisions that can lead to substantial reductions in both costs and emissions.”
One of the key findings is that as construction projects aim to speed up, there is an imperative to simultaneously reduce construction costs and CO2 emissions. The research indicates that the CPM is particularly effective for determining the optimal balance between time, cost, and environmental impact. Surapha notes, “Our results show that alternative construction methods can lead to significant efficiencies, not just in terms of time but also in minimizing the ecological footprint of construction activities.”
The implications of this research are profound for the construction industry. As companies face increasing scrutiny over their environmental practices, the ability to accelerate projects while decreasing costs and emissions could become a competitive advantage. This study serves as a clarion call for the industry to innovate and adapt, aligning with global sustainability goals.
By identifying the most effective construction methods, the research not only aids in reducing pollution but also provides a framework for future projects that prioritize both economic viability and environmental stewardship. The findings suggest that the construction sector could be on the cusp of a transformative shift, where sustainability is woven into the very fabric of project planning and execution.
For those interested in the intricate details of this research, further insights can be found at the Department of Civil Engineering, where Surapha and his team continue to explore advancements in construction methodologies.
