In the heart of Indonesia’s political evolution, a silent architectural revolution is underway, one that promises to redefine the nation’s identity and reshape its urban landscape. As the country prepares to move its capital from Jakarta to the planned city of Nusantara in Kalimantan, a profound transformation in architectural identity is taking place, with the new legislative complex at the forefront of this change.
Nita Dwi Estika, a researcher in architecture, has delved into this phenomenon in a recent study published in ‘ARTEKS: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur’ (translated as ‘ARTEKS: Journal of Architectural Engineering’). Her work explores the aspects of Indonesian architectural identity expressed in the design concept of the new parliament building, a symbol of the nation’s political stance and aspirations.
The study, which employs a descriptive qualitative approach, synthesizes insights from literature and webinars showcasing the winning designs from a legislative competition. Estika’s research highlights three key dimensions that elucidate Indonesia’s architectural identity formation within this context: symbolic representation, building and environmental aspects, and functional programming.
Symbolically, the legislature’s role as the voice of the people’s existence is showcased through a monumental axis arrangement. “The accommodation of the people’s existence is ensured by providing access to the legislative complex,” Estika explains. This inclusive approach is not only a political statement but also a commercial opportunity, as it opens up avenues for urban development and community engagement around the new capital.
Local identity enriches the formation of the national identity through the application of local architectural language. This emphasis on indigenous design elements and materials can boost local industries and create jobs, contributing to the region’s economic growth. Moreover, site-specific considerations play a vital role in shaping the building characteristics, ensuring that the architecture is not only a reflection of the nation’s identity but also a response to its environment.
The integration of environmental and social aspects into the architectural design of the new legislative complex sets a precedent for future developments in the field. As Estika notes, “Architecture, politics, and national identity encapsulate the aspirations and ideologies of a nation, reflecting in its built environment.” This holistic approach to design can inspire other projects to prioritize sustainability and community engagement, shaping a more inclusive and resilient urban landscape.
The commercial impacts of this research are significant, particularly for the energy sector. The emphasis on environmental aspects in the architectural design of the new legislative complex can drive demand for renewable energy solutions and energy-efficient technologies. As the new capital takes shape, there will be ample opportunities for businesses to innovate and invest in sustainable urban development.
In conclusion, Estika’s research sheds light on the intricate interplay between architecture, politics, and national identity in the context of Indonesia’s capital relocation. Her findings not only contribute to the academic discourse but also offer valuable insights for policymakers, architects, and businesses involved in shaping the future of Nusantara. As the nation embarks on this ambitious journey, the lessons learned from this study can guide the creation of a capital that is not only a symbol of Indonesia’s political evolution but also a testament to its architectural prowess and commitment to sustainability.