In the heart of Japan’s architectural history lies a fascinating narrative of transformation, one that intertwines the sacred with the utilitarian. Kaori Hasegawa, a researcher from the Department of Architecture at Tokyo University of the Arts, has delved into the intriguing world of modern imperial funerals, specifically those of Emperor Meiji and Emperor Taishō, to uncover a unique architectural phenomenon. Her research, published in the Japan Architectural Review, or “Nihon Kenchiku Kaiho” in Japanese, sheds light on the granting and conversion of ceremonial buildings, offering insights that could resonate with the contemporary construction and energy sectors.
Hasegawa’s study focuses on the Sōjōden, a temporary structure built to lay the coffin during imperial funerals. These buildings, initially constructed for ceremonial purposes, were later granted to various organizations and repurposed for different uses. “The granting and conversion of these buildings were not merely administrative acts,” Hasegawa explains. “They were deeply connected to the concepts of holiness and impurity, and played a significant role in building relationships with the Imperial House.”
The research reveals a shift in the central area of grant from Kyoto to Tokyo, reflecting the political and cultural transitions of the time. The buildings were primarily granted to local public bodies and charitable institutions, transforming into schools, hospitals, and other public facilities. This practice not only extended the life of the buildings but also embedded them with a sense of commemoration and historical significance.
The implications of this research extend beyond historical analysis. In today’s context, where sustainability and adaptive reuse are key priorities in the construction industry, Hasegawa’s findings offer valuable insights. The repurposing of buildings for new uses can significantly reduce the environmental impact of construction, a critical consideration for the energy sector. Moreover, the study highlights the potential of buildings to serve as vessels of memory and identity, a concept that could inspire innovative approaches to urban planning and community development.
As Hasegawa notes, “The converted buildings became symbols of the community’s relationship with the Imperial House, fostering a sense of shared history and identity.” This aspect of the research underscores the importance of preserving and adapting historical structures, not just for their architectural value, but also for their role in shaping collective memory and social cohesion.
In an era where the construction industry is increasingly focused on sustainability and adaptive reuse, Hasegawa’s research serves as a reminder of the rich history and potential of building conversion. As the energy sector seeks to reduce its environmental footprint, the lessons from Japan’s imperial funerals could offer valuable guidance. The study not only enriches our understanding of Japan’s architectural history but also provides a compelling case for the transformative power of adaptive reuse in modern construction.