Beijing Researchers Unveil Pipeline Seismic Resilience Breakthrough

In the ever-evolving landscape of the energy sector, the integrity and resilience of buried pipelines are paramount. A recent study published in *Yantu gongcheng xuebao* (translated to *Rock and Soil Mechanics*) by HOU Benwei and colleagues from the Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education at Beijing University of Technology sheds new light on how different joint types and cross connection patterns affect the seismic responses of pipeline structures. This research could have significant implications for the design and maintenance of pipeline infrastructure, particularly in seismically active regions.

The study focuses on the seismic behavior of ductile iron pipelines (DIP) with flexible socket rubber joints and cast iron pipelines (CIP) with rigid joints. Using finite element modeling, the researchers first examined the joint displacement and relative pipe-soil displacement of straight branch pipelines under seismic wave propagation. “We found that the peak joint displacement of DIP with flexible joints was larger than that of CIP with rigid joints,” explained lead author HOU Benwei. This finding alone could influence material selection and joint design in future pipeline projects.

The research then delved into the seismic responses of pipeline connections using various cross connection patterns—cross-shaped, T-shaped, L-shaped, and double-T-shaped. The pipe cross was connected to the branch pipelines using either socket or flange joints. The results were revealing. For pipelines connected with socket joints, the peak joint displacement of double-T-shaped connections was slightly smaller than that of cross-shaped and T-shaped connections. However, when flange joints were used, the DIP with flexible joints adjacent to the flange joints exhibited larger joint displacement and were more prone to tensile failure. Conversely, the CIP with rigid joints adjacent to the flange joint experienced greater axial compressive force and were more prone to compressive failure.

One of the most intriguing findings was observed at the cross of double-T-shaped pipelines. The responses of the socket joints adjacent to the flange joints were significantly larger than those of the cross-shaped and T-shaped connections. This could have profound implications for the design and safety assessments of complex pipeline networks.

The commercial impact of this research is substantial. For the energy sector, understanding the seismic behavior of different pipeline configurations can lead to more robust and resilient infrastructure. This, in turn, can reduce the risk of failures, minimize downtime, and lower maintenance costs. “Our findings provide a scientific basis for optimizing the design of pipeline connections in seismic regions,” said HOU Benwei. “This could be particularly beneficial for the energy sector, where the integrity of pipelines is crucial for both safety and economic reasons.”

As the energy sector continues to expand and adapt to new challenges, research like this is invaluable. It not only enhances our understanding of the seismic behavior of pipelines but also paves the way for more innovative and resilient designs. The insights gained from this study could shape future developments in the field, ensuring that pipeline infrastructure is better equipped to withstand the forces of nature.

Scroll to Top
×